Measurement · Model and instruments

Metrics & Continuous Improvement

I design the model connecting reaction, learning, behavior, and impact without treating correlation as causation. The work defines what to measure, where the data comes from, and how to read the signals; business outcomes and integrated dashboards depend on data quality and later implementation.

Service at a glance

Duration

Implementation and cadence agreed

Audience

Sponsors, HR/L&D, analytics, and area managers

Outcome

Baseline, instruments, indicator dictionary, and a reading prototype

Format

Measurement design

Who it's for

  • Sponsors who need an evidence narrative compatible with the data that is actually available.
  • HR, L&D, and managers who need to separate satisfaction, learning, and behavior change.
  • Analytics, technology, and operations teams that will own sources, integrations, and recurring reviews.

How it works

  • Map the decisions measurement needs to support and the sources that can be accessed.
  • Build the reaction → learning → behavior → impact ladder, with explicit hypotheses between levels.
  • Define the baseline, instruments, calculation rules, segments, and data owners.
  • Create the indicator dictionary and the cadence for collection, review, and decisions.
  • Prototype the reading as a non-integrated dashboard or report, based on data volume and maturity.

What you get

  • Measurement model with questions, levels, and interpretation limits
  • Baseline plan and collection instruments
  • Indicator dictionary with formula, source, frequency, owner, and caveats
  • Review cadence and a decision guide for improvements
  • Non-integrated dashboard prototype or report model validated with available data

Related case studies

Frequently asked questions

Which data does the company need to provide?

It depends on the selected decisions and indicators. Participation, learning, survey, authorized tool usage, quality, or process data may be needed. The company remains responsible for access, legal basis, privacy, quality, and an owner for each source.

Does the model prove that AI caused a business outcome?

Not automatically. Attribution requires a comparable design, a consistent baseline, and controls for other factors. When these do not exist, the model separates observed evidence, perception, and hypothesis instead of converting correlation into a proven gain.

Is the deliverable an integrated dashboard or a report?

The scope delivers the logic and a reading format: a non-integrated dashboard prototype or report model, depending on the data. Connectors, automation, a BI environment, and ongoing operations are technical dependencies or later scopes.

Contact

To talk about this service, write to oi@dorly.com.br.

Other services

AI Adoption Strategy

Before commissioning training, technology, or metrics, this engagement organizes the decisions: where to start, which pilot fits the context, who is accountable for it, and what needs to happen next. The scope ends with an approved design; execution, integrations, and operations are later workstreams.

Learning Paths & Workshops

Purchasable formats for a synchronous decision-making and practice experience: executive session, hands-on workshop, or modular path. Each format combines facilitation, real tasks, and feedback during the activity; it is not a generic lecture or a promise of behavior change without follow-through.

AI Prototypes & Demos

MVPs, automations, and demos to test an idea's value before scaling — using tools like ChatGPT, OpenAI API, n8n, TypeScript, and AWS to prove what works with a tight scope.

Enablement Playbooks & Assets

Enablement means giving a team practical conditions to use AI without always depending on outside help. The package turns recurring decisions and tasks into editable playbooks, templates, rubrics, and guides with a defined audience, validation path, owner, and maintenance rule.